This Data Analytics Simulation: Strategic Decision Making case study introduces the power of analytics in decision-making. As the brand manager for laundry detergent, one must implement decisions to boost brand performance through the application of sophisticated analytic techniques. This is geared to determining issues and strategies which could help a company in the long run.
- Harvard Marketing Simulation Solution Yeah, reviewing a books harvard marketing simulation solution could increase your near friends listings. This is just one of the solutions for you to be successful. As understood, feat does not recommend that you have astounding points.
- The Harvard Digital Project Simulations have been a real eye opener for me when it comes to digital project management. I have had some project management experience, but never with a digital project. The simulations provide all the usual headaches and barriers, such as HR issues, external factors (competitors), team morale, scope and budget.
In this simulation, students take on the role of a newly appointed CEO tasked with defining and executing a business-to-business (B2B) marketing strategy for a motion capture sensor company. Students will learn how to continuously innovate and implement a marketing strategy in a mature market that will help them establish and maintain.
Thomas H. Davenport
Harvard Business School Publishing (7050-HTM-ENG)
Feb 24, 2016
Case questions answered:
- Illustrating that understanding some of the underlying factors and segments in data helps develop a coherent marketing approach over several years.
- Showing that analytics and decision-making are iterative processes and after each new decision there is typically new data to analyze and understand.
- Suggesting that successful financial performance is the result of several possible, and combinations, of factors-rarely, does a single variable explain an outcome.
- Communicating that all predictions and forecasts are based on probabilistic assumptions resulting in a range of possible results.
Not the questions you were looking for? Submit your questions & get answers.
Case answers for Data Analytics Simulation: Strategic Decision Making
Logic behind Strategies1
2019
Learning from mistakes with a previous simulation, Blue’s Brand Team is setting the production to 40M units, which is slightly larger than the forecasted demand of approximately 32M. We2 expect our investment in Digital Ads (35% of Total Media Budget) to help us reach out to more potential customers in our target market segment (individuals under 44 years old), which was selected based on the Primary Customer Segment3 for Pods4 (the top formulation on the Formulation Demand graph in all simulations). This segment was also essential to determine, for example, a higher investment on Convenience for trade channels, as they often look for the “most convenient,” “premium” options. Price remained at $7 per unit, based on the Price Point Demand graph from the previous simulation, which illustrated that at $5-7 per unit, demand for 2019 was 39,140,217 units. Convenience and Club were the trade channels with the highest rates, so the received a higher percentage of the category budget.
Result: Growth in Market Share to 14%, and significant growth in revenue (around 24%) in a year when the revenue of all Blue’s competitors declined.
2020
With 2019’s simulation, we learned that the demand for Blue’s Pods at a price range of $7-9 would be of more than 52M units. Given the forecasted demand for 2020 (an average of 48M), however, we decided that continuing with the price of $7 per unit and trying to reach out to a broader audience (as the demand for this price would be more than 98M units) would be unfeasible. The most coherent decision is to raise prices to $9 per unit, so we continue to approach the same audience while maximizing profits. Trade channel, media spend, formulation, product feature, and segmentation will remain the same, so the impact of the increase in prices can be analyzed with reduced noise from the variables.
Result: This was a bad year for Blue. Market share dropped to 8.5%, and revenue decreased significantly.
2021
The price will be reduced to $8 per unit given the decrease in sales last year. Based on the report for Consumed Media, we decided to redistribute the media spend percentages, increasing Print in 3% and decreasing TV in the same amount. Demand is forecasted to be approximately 28M units. We will produce 35M with the expectations that lower prices are correlated to a larger demand.
Result: Blue’s performance was mediocre. It was definitely better than last year’s, but market shares slightly improved – now at 9.5%, and revenue increased modestly.
2022
For the last year of simulations, we decided to keep the price at $8 per unit, and the production at 35M units, given that demand was similar to the previous year’s, and Blue does not intend to accumulate large amounts of inventory. We upgraded the percentage of digital ads to 40%, making it the leading media tool for engagement with customers.
Final Result: The simulation ends with blue conquering a 9.9% market share, which is almost ⅔ of the value the company reached in 2019, but it is important highlighting that it was an unusual year for the industry when all the competitors underperformed, and Blue’s price was still $7 per unit, probably offering a high cost-benefit relationship to consumers. Although Blue’s revenue was still the smallest in the industry after the simulation (Exhibit 1), the company had the second highest operating profitability (Exhibit 2). Also, for 3 out of the 4 simulation years, the majority of social media sentiment shared about the brand was positive, which means the image of the brand has significantly improved as a consequence of decisions like increasing digital ads spending. The final cumulative operating profit was $243.9M.
Exhibit 1. Revenue Graph from the Data Analysis Simulation for Blue Detergents
Exhibit 2. Operating Profit Graph from the Data Analysis Simulation for Blue Detergents
Business Concepts
Above the Revenue Line
For this exercise, I kept in mind that while we should focus on maximizing profitability and market share while reducing costs if possible as end goals, these could only be achieved through an effective marketing plan. Understanding the dynamics of the market, including the overall trends of the industry, and how the perception of the brand changes with social media engagement, for instance, was crucial to the establishment of a strategy that connected marketing needs to financial success.
In 2019, for example, following only the financial forecasts for demand would probably lead managers in reducing production. Blue was expected to sell around 32M units in that year. Understanding the needs and preferences of the customers, however, made a difference. With the choice of producing detergent pods, the formulation with biggest growth potential, increasing the digital ads’ budget and the investment in convenient trade channels, while keeping the initial price, allowed Blue to sell all produced units and be the most profitable company in the industry in a year all its competitors underperformed.
Marketing Viability
The application of this LO overlapped with the previous one’s multiple times during the simulation. While the goal was to maximize financial measures of good performance, I focused on interpreting multiple trends in order to better understand the market’s limitation and what the best strategy would be accordingly.
For 2021, for instance, the Price Point Demand graph informed me that at $8 a unit, the market had a need for Blue’s product corresponding to more than 52M units. Given that, however, sales did not meet the demand for the previous year, I analyzed more closely the forecasted demand of around 28M. Setting the production to 35M that year allowed Blue to be more realistic in regards to the market’s demand and accumulate less inventory.
Reference
Davenport, T. (2016). Data Analytics Simulation: Strategic Decision Making. Available on November 29, 2017, at https://cb.hbsp.harvard.edu/cbmp/product/7050-HTM-ENG
Endnotes:
1 simulation: The simulation for Blue’s case is developed and interpreted according to a perspective that allowed the company to create a profitable strategy for growth.
2 I chose to write this part in the first person of the plural in order to convey the idea that these decisions were taken
by a brand team, by more than a single manager.
3 From Exhibit 1 on the case description.
4 audience: Understanding of the main audience whose needs this product would be sufficing was essential to making a decision that allowed the company to increase profitability and positive sentiment among consumers.
Did this solution help you?
(20 votes, average: 2.70 out of 5)
This Data Analytics Simulation: Strategic Decision Making case study introduces the power of analytics in decision-making. As the brand manager for laundry detergent, one must implement decisions to boost brand performance through the application of sophisticated analytic techniques. This is geared to determining issues and strategies which could help a company in the long run.
Thomas H. Davenport
Harvard Business School Publishing (7050-HTM-ENG)
Feb 24, 2016
Harvard Marketing Simulation Tips
Case questions answered:
- Illustrating that understanding some of the underlying factors and segments in data helps develop a coherent marketing approach over several years.
- Showing that analytics and decision-making are iterative processes and after each new decision there is typically new data to analyze and understand.
- Suggesting that successful financial performance is the result of several possible, and combinations, of factors-rarely, does a single variable explain an outcome.
- Communicating that all predictions and forecasts are based on probabilistic assumptions resulting in a range of possible results.
Not the questions you were looking for? Submit your questions & get answers.
Case answers for Data Analytics Simulation: Strategic Decision Making
Logic behind Strategies1
2019
Learning from mistakes with a previous simulation, Blue’s Brand Team is setting the production to 40M units, which is slightly larger than the forecasted demand of approximately 32M. We2 expect our investment in Digital Ads (35% of Total Media Budget) to help us reach out to more potential customers in our target market segment (individuals under 44 years old), which was selected based on the Primary Customer Segment3 for Pods4 (the top formulation on the Formulation Demand graph in all simulations). This segment was also essential to determine, for example, a higher investment on Convenience for trade channels, as they often look for the “most convenient,” “premium” options. Price remained at $7 per unit, based on the Price Point Demand graph from the previous simulation, which illustrated that at $5-7 per unit, demand for 2019 was 39,140,217 units. Convenience and Club were the trade channels with the highest rates, so the received a higher percentage of the category budget.
Result: Growth in Market Share to 14%, and significant growth in revenue (around 24%) in a year when the revenue of all Blue’s competitors declined.
2020
With 2019’s simulation, we learned that the demand for Blue’s Pods at a price range of $7-9 would be of more than 52M units. Given the forecasted demand for 2020 (an average of 48M), however, we decided that continuing with the price of $7 per unit and trying to reach out to a broader audience (as the demand for this price would be more than 98M units) would be unfeasible. The most coherent decision is to raise prices to $9 per unit, so we continue to approach the same audience while maximizing profits. Trade channel, media spend, formulation, product feature, and segmentation will remain the same, so the impact of the increase in prices can be analyzed with reduced noise from the variables.
Result: This was a bad year for Blue. Market share dropped to 8.5%, and revenue decreased significantly.
2021
The price will be reduced to $8 per unit given the decrease in sales last year. Based on the report for Consumed Media, we decided to redistribute the media spend percentages, increasing Print in 3% and decreasing TV in the same amount. Demand is forecasted to be approximately 28M units. We will produce 35M with the expectations that lower prices are correlated to a larger demand.
Result: Blue’s performance was mediocre. It was definitely better than last year’s, but market shares slightly improved – now at 9.5%, and revenue increased modestly.
2022
For the last year of simulations, we decided to keep the price at $8 per unit, and the production at 35M units, given that demand was similar to the previous year’s, and Blue does not intend to accumulate large amounts of inventory. We upgraded the percentage of digital ads to 40%, making it the leading media tool for engagement with customers.
Final Result: The simulation ends with blue conquering a 9.9% market share, which is almost ⅔ of the value the company reached in 2019, but it is important highlighting that it was an unusual year for the industry when all the competitors underperformed, and Blue’s price was still $7 per unit, probably offering a high cost-benefit relationship to consumers. Although Blue’s revenue was still the smallest in the industry after the simulation (Exhibit 1), the company had the second highest operating profitability (Exhibit 2). Also, for 3 out of the 4 simulation years, the majority of social media sentiment shared about the brand was positive, which means the image of the brand has significantly improved as a consequence of decisions like increasing digital ads spending. The final cumulative operating profit was $243.9M.
Exhibit 1. Revenue Graph from the Data Analysis Simulation for Blue Detergents
Exhibit 2. Operating Profit Graph from the Data Analysis Simulation for Blue Detergents
Business Concepts
Above the Revenue Line
For this exercise, I kept in mind that while we should focus on maximizing profitability and market share while reducing costs if possible as end goals, these could only be achieved through an effective marketing plan. Understanding the dynamics of the market, including the overall trends of the industry, and how the perception of the brand changes with social media engagement, for instance, was crucial to the establishment of a strategy that connected marketing needs to financial success.
In 2019, for example, following only the financial forecasts for demand would probably lead managers in reducing production. Blue was expected to sell around 32M units in that year. Understanding the needs and preferences of the customers, however, made a difference. With the choice of producing detergent pods, the formulation with biggest growth potential, increasing the digital ads’ budget and the investment in convenient trade channels, while keeping the initial price, allowed Blue to sell all produced units and be the most profitable company in the industry in a year all its competitors underperformed.
Marketing Viability
The application of this LO overlapped with the previous one’s multiple times during the simulation. While the goal was to maximize financial measures of good performance, I focused on interpreting multiple trends in order to better understand the market’s limitation and what the best strategy would be accordingly.
Marketing Simulation Answers
For 2021, for instance, the Price Point Demand graph informed me that at $8 a unit, the market had a need for Blue’s product corresponding to more than 52M units. Given that, however, sales did not meet the demand for the previous year, I analyzed more closely the forecasted demand of around 28M. Setting the production to 35M that year allowed Blue to be more realistic in regards to the market’s demand and accumulate less inventory.
Reference
Marketing Simulation Game
Davenport, T. (2016). Data Analytics Simulation: Strategic Decision Making. Available on November 29, 2017, at https://cb.hbsp.harvard.edu/cbmp/product/7050-HTM-ENG
Endnotes:
1 simulation: The simulation for Blue’s case is developed and interpreted according to a perspective that allowed the company to create a profitable strategy for growth.
2 I chose to write this part in the first person of the plural in order to convey the idea that these decisions were taken
by a brand team, by more than a single manager.
3 From Exhibit 1 on the case description.
4 audience: Understanding of the main audience whose needs this product would be sufficing was essential to making a decision that allowed the company to increase profitability and positive sentiment among consumers.
Did this solution help you?
Harvard Marketing Simulation Answers
(20 votes, average: 2.70 out of 5)